I want to address several recent letters to the editor related to the endorsement process conducted by a local political committee. As a former Murrysville Council member who held office for eight years until I termed out, I feel that I am more than qualified to speak about the endorsement process.
The authors of these letters intimated that the use of a proxy to endorse a candidate was underhanded at best but more likely malfeasance. However, the endorsement process and the use of proxies was specifically intended to encourage participation and ensure that the vote accurately represents our district’s sentiments. In our recent endorsement vote, more than 30 residents with widely differing views took the time to vote in support of various candidates. This process demonstrates a strong commitment to our democratic principles and ensures the unique interests of residents living in different precincts are represented.
Of interest, several individuals whose candidate wasn’t endorsed have voiced discontent with the outcome. It is worth noting that in a previous instance when their preferred candidate received an endorsement, there was no complaint about the process. This inconsistency raises questions about the motives behind their objections and looks to be hypocritical from my perspective.
We should prioritize candidates who are genuinely passionate about serving our community for the full term of their office, rather than those seeking a local position merely as a steppingstone to higher political ambitions.
David Perry
Murrysville